On Thu, Jul 04, 2019 at 02:42:15PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > > > We know that cgroupv2 already (and for a long time...) works better > > than v1, so I'd rather make the switch unconditional, using the usual > > phrasing of "In the unlikely case catastrophic problems are discovered > > with v2, the default will be reverted to v1.". > > Do you know if cgropvs2 makes process termination reporting less or more > exact? It's this bug: > > <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154011> > > I think in the past, cgroups changes have occasionally made this issue > significantly worse, to the extent that it was no longer possible to run > tests reliably that spawn and join many threads (but never running more > than a reasonable count in parallel).
No idea if v2 affects this specific issue with RLIMIT_NPROC and threads in any way. But in a related matter — v2 makes improves the reporting of empty cgroups, which makes process termination detection much easier. This fixes some corner cases and bugs with service termination in systemd. Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
