* Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > We know that cgroupv2 already (and for a long time...) works better > than v1, so I'd rather make the switch unconditional, using the usual > phrasing of "In the unlikely case catastrophic problems are discovered > with v2, the default will be reverted to v1.".
Do you know if cgropvs2 makes process termination reporting less or more exact? It's this bug: <https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=154011> I think in the past, cgroups changes have occasionally made this issue significantly worse, to the extent that it was no longer possible to run tests reliably that spawn and join many threads (but never running more than a reasonable count in parallel). Thanks, Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
