On Tuesday, 25 June 2019 at 14:36, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 23:17:30 -0500, > Justin Forbes <jmfor...@linuxtx.org> wrote: > > > > It is not a violent cheat. It was proposed this way 2 years ago. At > > the time a SIG was created to maintain i686 so that it could continue > > as a secondary arch. They are inactive. See the post in the SIG there. > > When a call for a status was made (as the only traffic on their list > > so far this year), it got a single reply from someone saying that they > > would no longer have 32bit hardware as of August. > > I'm the one who responded.
FWIW, I still have two Asus EeePCs (900 and 1000) that are being used. They're Atom N270 based, so 32-bit only. I'd like to run the most recent Fedora on them, but I don't have much time to devote to debugging i686-specific issues. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org There should be a science of discontent. People need hard times and oppression to develop psychic muscles. -- from "Collected Sayings of Muad'Dib" by the Princess Irulan _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
