On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 9:32 PM Chris Adams <li...@cmadams.net> wrote: > > Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> said: > > On 6/24/19 10:00 AM, Justin Forbes wrote: > > > On Mon, Jun 24, 2019 at 11:41 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > > >> Maybe the Change could be renamed to reflect the full impact: > > >> "No more i686 kernels or images"? > > > > > > Changed on the wiki. > > > > Note that as far as I recall, this also means containers, as we need a > > kernel to build those, right? > > If there are no i686 images, and no i686 containers, and anaconda can't > install i686 userspace with x86_64 kernel... is there any regular way to > consume i686 applications? It seems like the only reason to continue > building i686 RPMs would be for multilib (and their build dependencies), > which is a small subset of the total RPMs.
Third parties using the userspace with their own kernels, I know there were groups using a custom kernel with i686 for various OLPC use cases still. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
