Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2019 at 11:18 AM John Harris <joh...@splentity.com> wrote: >> >> On Friday, January 18, 2019 8:14:32 AM EST Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> Note: Adding the Signed-off-by: line to a patch should be a conscious >>> act and means that you certify you have the rights to submit this work >>> under the same open source license. >> >> I'd argue that changing your project-specific .gitconfig to sign-off any >> commits is definitely a conscious act. Regardless, proprietary projects would >> have just as much of a reason to have their developers sign-off their >> commits, >> unless they solve the issue through a strong CLA or other contract with all >> developers contributing. This is not specific to 'open source' or free >> software projects. > > I was quoting from the git manpage. I didn't choose those words. Take > it up with git upstream :-)
In case anyone chooses to do so, here's the last thread
where a commit.signoff config option patch was suggested:
https://public-inbox.org/git/20180206043723.GB30460@localhost/
There are links there to previous discussions, to provide
background.
--
Todd
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
