On Thu, Dec 20, 2018 at 07:38:29AM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete > stuff? I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
The choice of implementation details is yours. You can always ask FESCo for opinion, but I don't think you'll get one that is much more definitive than the discussion here on the list. Zbyszek > On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:00 PM Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> > wrote: > > > > >>>>> "KL" == Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> writes: > > > > KL> I agree with Zbyszek, I think it would be best to push the changes > > KL> directly to git. > > > > But then we're back to the same problem: Do you remove the ldconfig > > calls entirely or do you add the macros? Prepare for flames if you get > > it wrong, even though it's nontrivial to get it right and reverting is > > far quicker than flaming. Then again, getting people more used to the > > idea that automated process are going to be making changes to packages > > is a good thing. > > > > All of this reminds me that it's well past time to move forward with the > > mass Group: removal. At least that one is a trivial change. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
