So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete stuff? I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 8:00 PM Jason L Tibbitts III <ti...@math.uh.edu> wrote: > > >>>>> "KL" == Kalev Lember <kalevlem...@gmail.com> writes: > > KL> I agree with Zbyszek, I think it would be best to push the changes > KL> directly to git. > > But then we're back to the same problem: Do you remove the ldconfig > calls entirely or do you add the macros? Prepare for flames if you get > it wrong, even though it's nontrivial to get it right and reverting is > far quicker than flaming. Then again, getting people more used to the > idea that automated process are going to be making changes to packages > is a good thing. > > All of this reminds me that it's well past time to move forward with the > mass Group: removal. At least that one is a trivial change. > > - J< > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
