On Wednesday, December 19, 2018 5:10:21 AM EST Bruno Wolff III wrote: > gnupg2 is now obsoleting gnupg and the previous gpg command is not > available. > The change page said gpg would be renamed gpg1, but this was > not done. Unfortunately gpg2 will not read my existing secret keys. (They > are pretty old and probably should be replaced.) For now using rpm --nodeps > allowed me to replaced the gnupg2 version of gpg with the gnupg version so > I could get at some encrypted data, but it would be nice if the plan from > the change page had been used instead of what was done. If the plan has > changed, then updating the change page to match what was done would be > nice. Though in the latter case there should be a warning about breaking > things for some people. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I can't believe this was done without using the alternatives system! -- John M. Harris, Jr. <joh...@splentity.com> Splentity https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
