Seems that I missed writing announcement, but there is a package called `gnupg1` which provides `gpg1` binary.
So you should be fine with that I hope. And sorry for this trouble. On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 11:25 AM Bruno Wolff III <br...@wolff.to> wrote: > > gnupg2 is now obsoleting gnupg and the previous gpg command is not available. > The change page said gpg would be renamed gpg1, but this was not done. > Unfortunately gpg2 will not read my existing secret keys. (They are pretty > old and probably should be replaced.) For now using rpm --nodeps allowed > me to replaced the gnupg2 version of gpg with the gnupg version so I could > get at some encrypted data, but it would be nice if the plan from the change > page had been used instead of what was done. If the plan has changed, then > updating the change page to match what was done would be nice. Though in > the latter case there should be a warning about breaking things for some > people. > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
