On 08/10/2010 05:42 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:03:32 +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>
>
>> No, I think more like someone who could have given him 10, gave him 5,
>> with a promise of another 5, if he paid 10.
>>
>
> That someone is under no obligation whatsoever to give him anything.
>
> Now, don't get me wrong, I'm not saying that we should be immensely grateful
> for every morsel of code thrown our way, but one cannot argue that the OSE
> edition
> of syslog-ng is a useless piece of crippleware that does nothing useful
> compared
> to the PE version (except bugging people to buy the PE edition).
>
> It's a useful piece of code in it's own right.
syslog-ng is useful, I do not object to that. I even tried to use it 2
years ago. But it's also easy replaceable with rsyslog which includes
everything and a kitchen sink as an extra bonus.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
