On Tue, Sep 4, 2018 at 12:29 AM Michael Adam <ma...@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 11:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
> zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 09:38:44PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
>> > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <
>> > zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
>> >
>> > > On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:29:34PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote:
>> > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Peter Robinson <
>> pbrobin...@gmail.com>
>> > > wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Adam <ma...@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi all,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Tinyproxy just released a new version 1.10 which is has been
>> overdue
>> > > > > > and containes 2 CVE fixes apart from several enhancements.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I created builds for rawhide already.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > I was wondering if it is still possible to get tinyproxy to this
>> > > > > important
>> > > > > > update in f29, since no other packages depend on it, afaict.
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > If so, what do I do? Just update the scm branch and bring it in
>> > > through
>> > > > > Bodhi?
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > Thanks for the swift response!
>> > > >
>> > > > (And apologies for any cluelessness about newer aspects of the
>> fedora
>> > > > process - it's been a while since i did these things, and it worked
>> a
>> > > little
>> > > > differently then...)
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > > Sounds like a reasonable course of action. Is it backward
>> compatible
>> > > > > in terms of any interface people might use?
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > There are a few config file additions.
>> > > > The location of the binary has changed from /usr/sbin
>> > > > to /usr/bin . Otherwise no Interfaces i'm aware of.
>> > >
>> > > You should create a compat symlink from the old location to the new
>> > > location, at least in the stable releases, in case somebody calls the
>> > > binary by path.
>> > >
>> >
>> > Good point.
>> >
>> > - Is there an established way to create such a "compat symlink"?
>>
>> ln -s ../bin/NAME %{buildroot}/usr/sbin/NAME
>>
>> would be the standard way.
>>
>> > - What do you mean by "stable releases"?
>> > Does F29 (which is not released yet) qualify as that?
>> I meant F28 and F27, but since this costs so little, I'd do the same
>> for F29 too.
>>
>
> Hmm, ok. I guess it is not a problem at this point
> if f29 thereby goes one build ahead of master.
> If needed later, we can still bump master's release number..
>
This is wrong, rawhide version should be always newer. You can either bump
release in rawhide and do no changes there or bump release *after* %{?dist}
in f29/f28.
> Thanks - Michael
>
>
>> Zbyszek
>> _______________________________________________
>> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
>> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> List Archives:
>> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>
--
-Igor Gnatenko
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
