On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 7:07 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek < zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2018 at 06:29:34PM +0200, Michael Adam wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 5:23 PM, Peter Robinson <pbrobin...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:07 PM Michael Adam <ma...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > Tinyproxy just released a new version 1.10 which is has been overdue > > > > and containes 2 CVE fixes apart from several enhancements. > > > > > > > > I created builds for rawhide already. > > > > > > > > I was wondering if it is still possible to get tinyproxy to this > > > important > > > > update in f29, since no other packages depend on it, afaict. > > > > > > > > If so, what do I do? Just update the scm branch and bring it in > through > > > Bodhi? > > > > > > > Thanks for the swift response! > > > > (And apologies for any cluelessness about newer aspects of the fedora > > process - it's been a while since i did these things, and it worked a > little > > differently then...) > > > > > > > Sounds like a reasonable course of action. Is it backward compatible > > > in terms of any interface people might use? > > > > > > There are a few config file additions. > > The location of the binary has changed from /usr/sbin > > to /usr/bin . Otherwise no Interfaces i'm aware of. > > You should create a compat symlink from the old location to the new > location, at least in the stable releases, in case somebody calls the > binary by path. > Good point. - Is there an established way to create such a "compat symlink"? - What do you mean by "stable releases"? Does F29 (which is not released yet) qualify as that? > > > If so once it's baked in > > > f29 for a bit, we're in freeze atm any so it won't progress from > > > updates-testing -> stable until Beta gets signed off, you might want > > > to consider pushing to stable releases too due to CVEs > > > > > > > Ok, so can you or s/o confirm next steps: > > > > - bring it to the f29 scm > > - build > > - add it to bodhi and wait for a while > > - possibly push to stable after some time > > > > correct? > Yes, this looks correct.\ > Thanks - Michael > Zbyszek > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists. > fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
