On Tue, Jul 31, 2018 at 09:06:13AM +0200, Michael Mraka wrote: > > > > Is there a reason why we can't change YUM to match the DNF behavior? > > IMO, the YUM behavior is nonsense and isn't even a valid package > > identifier. > > Actually E:N-V-R.A is yum-ism no one else understand > while N-E:V-R.A is correct rpm format. > > So if you want make world a better place stick with current dnf format.
I think this, with the combination of earlier suggestion, is the best solution for Fedora. So: 1) make yum calculate checksum primarly with DNF format 2) when there's a discrepancy, let yum calculate csum in legacy yum format This way: - dnf is not bothered - users of yum have continuous history - new yum users have checksum calculated in better way Win-win! -- Tomasz Torcz Only gods can safely risk perfection, xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl it's a dangerous thing for a man. -- Alia _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/TT3ZVQBBJGQGQYIVOWBC7L6Y2D5WCF4J/
