On Wed, May 23, 2018 at 6:05 PM, Miro Hrončok <mhron...@redhat.com> wrote:
> This change indeed is not very beneficial to user installs. Except maybe for > highly experienced users who would like to ship their own /usr/bin/python > (except I don't think that's a good idea anyway). > > The benefit here is for the distro itself. I get that, but an internal benefit that ends up breaking users' software is not beneficial to Fedora. Couldn't we accomplish the same thing by doing a side build against a modified python2 package but not propagate that out to the users? I understand that finding the packages that will break helps us understand the impact of python2 removal, but that doesn't mean we have to expose it in the released product. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/K7CJXUCAHSWYOCP6E3I4C2H7RIJQN6VM/
