On 23.5.2018 20:36, Ben Cotton wrote:
And so if the python symlink is a separate package that always gets
installed alongside python2, then is there really any benefit to this
change?
This change indeed is not very beneficial to user installs. Except maybe
for highly experienced users who would like to ship their own
/usr/bin/python (except I don't think that's a good idea anyway).
The benefit here is for the distro itself.
It's a preparatory change for python2 removal that should make sure we
don't accidentally ship bits that rely on "python" being there and being
python2.
Breaking things is the only way we find sufficient for the packages to
change. Also, rendering the packages FTBFS would give us some idea about
them being (un)maintained.
Dealing with all the python2/python3 thing, we get an impression that
there are plenty of packages simply using "python" laying dead for ages.
We need to know what's the real impact of removing python2 if we keep
dragging them around and keep them working.
Packages that follow the guidelines don't need to worry.
Packages that don't will get a build failure reminder.
Packages that are dead will die (or somebody will resurrect them when
orphaned).
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/4ESKA33RWOZ7RMCZEOYCOT5FMSVQZLEL/
