Hello, I would prefer to keep Network Manager as core. I don't see what benefits would bring if it's removed and marked as optional.
Regards, Silvia FAS: Lailah On 18 January 2018 at 13:31, Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: > On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 09:28:30AM +0100, David Demelier wrote: > > Since systemd-networkd is a mature network system daemon nowadays, > > NetworkManager can be avoided in many cases where people do not need > > desktop features. > > I propose to remove NetworkManager from the “Core” group and mark it as > > optional or eventually move it into a dedicated group. Perhaps “Common > > NetworkManager Submodules”? > > What do you think? > > I'm not super-excited about having multiple very different ways of > configuring networking. We were finally on track to one path via > NetworkManager. > > At the very least, I'd like to see a generator so systemd-networkd can > read and understand basic ifcfg files, and I'd like the transition back > and forth to be seamless if NetworkManager is installed or removed. > > Note that NetworkManager also now has a lightweight "run once and exit" > mode that can be used when "desktop features" or other advanced > functionality isn't needed. Since a lot of its development is funded by > Red Hat for enterprise needs, NetworkManager is a lot more than just a > desktop thing. > > -- > Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> > Fedora Project Leader > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org >
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
