On Thu, Nov 09, 2017 at 12:23:33PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > I'm of a mind to urge that cups be considered a system library (as it's > > upstream also argues) > > Possibly this is something we could formally define with Modularity. > (That is, all libraries in Platform & Host are "system libraries")?
Leaving aside "applications" for now -- What about the case where one of those "system libraries" (say, GTK+) directly depends on another "system library" (say, libcups) which now sports an incompatible license? Because that's the problem we're actually facing here... - Solomon -- Solomon Peachy pizza at shaftnet dot org Coconut Creek, FL ^^ (email/xmpp) ^^ Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum videtur.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
