I'll try to convince Mike to make a dual license.
On 11/08/2017 04:34 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: > On Wed, Nov 08, 2017 at 03:25:22PM +0000, Daniel P. Berrange wrote: >> Well that page only refers to OpenSSL and even then it points out that other >> distros have differing opinions. Personally I think it is dubious even for >> OpenSSL, and if you start broadening it further to claim it applies to what >> are effectively application level libiraries like libcups, where does it end >> ? >> You could just claim it applies to any widely used library in Fedora, at >> which >> point you're effectively just trying to nullify all licensing rules, whichs >> is >> not acceptable IMHO. > I've bumped this over to the legal mailing list [1]. We'll see what > their far more knowledgable heads have to say. > > [1] > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/TYGLR34XR6L6MAXMVSDNYT3ZYXUKY7FX/ > > - Solomon > > > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org -- Zdenek Dohnal Associate Software Engineer Red Hat Czech - Brno TPB-C
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
