On Wed, Aug 02, 2017 at 09:23:05AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The issue I am seeing with this is that people who want to keep existing > scripts are also wanting to keep existing package mechanism. If I say yum > install httpd I am expecting to get the RPMs and setup I have for N years. > I am not expecting to get a profile and modular set of tools decided by > someone else who came up with a name httpd which matches a different case > need. The same with WordPress or some other toolkit. > > If the module WordPress pulls in maria-db and my site has been using > PostgreSQL, I am not just going to be confused.. I am going to be angry > because my other scripts to seed the database aren't working. The quick
Good examples, thanks. Do you think that this problem is as bad if we overload / replace / enhance comps groups and the @ syntax? Or do we need to find a different character? (Uh, I guess % is sitting out there....) -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
