On 05/18/2017 09:41 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > On 18 May 2017 at 14:33, Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote: >> That's a perfectly reasonable request. I think it's fair to say that if no >> central user management is required, it's reasonable that our default would >> be >> to drop 'sss' from nsswitch.conf and turn nscd back on (to avoid I/O lookups >> on >> the local files). >> >> Though if we do that, I'd still like to see some daemon *somewhere* >> monitoring >> the files and flushing the nscd cache if they are modified, because an >> outdated >> nscd cache is one of the hardest things for an end-user to debug because >> there's >> really nowhere that can log it. >> >> > > The lack of logging of nscd, if anything, I'd argue is a reason for > the various Working Groups for the Products to have sssd enabled (with > sss at the start of nsswitch) and running by default, and with systemd > always restarting it.
In other words, the exact current state of Fedora 26 (modulo the systemd piece; some parts of SSSD can be auto-managed by systemd, the rest are managed by the sssd "monitor" process which does the auto-restarting if needed).
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
