On 05/15/2017 11:28 AM, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
> On 15 May 2017 at 17:15, Jakub Hrozek <jhro...@redhat.com> wrote:
>> This change proposes leveraging a new "files" provider SSSD will ship in
>> the next version in order to resolve also users from the local files.
>> That way, the "sss" NSS module can be configured before the files module
>> in nsswitch.conf and the system could leverage sss_nss caching for both
>> local and remote users.
> So someone reinvented the wheel/nscd?


Tomasz, your tone is needlessly hostile. If you have a question, ask it. If you 
want to make a suggestion, make it. But casting aspersions on people doing work 
is unacceptable.

Frankly, nearly all of your posts to this list have been hostile to the rest of 
the community and have not added to the discussion in any way. You can do 
better than this, and we expect you to do so if you don't want people to just 
start blocking your messages and ignoring you entirely.


Now, in this particular case, what happened is that SSSD was developed which is 
a significant improvement over NSCD when used with central identity stores like 
LDAP, FreeIPA, etc. However, one down-side to this is that it can't coexist 
with nscd because nscd is too greedy and doesn't allow requests to always pass 
to the SSSD service. So when using SSSD for central identities, we take a 
performance hit on local lookups (they need to go to I/O against the disk). A 
recent enhancement to SSSD allows the performance to be restored to nscd levels 
when dealing with the local accounts. So we enabled that and made SSSD the 
primary source for lookups.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

Reply via email to