On Wed, Nov 02, 2016 at 04:10:53PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: > I drafted a process to cover the evaluation of "Important bugs" [1]. > It still needs some work on the wording, however it should be good > enough for review and comments. May I ask for a feedback and possibly > improvement proposals, please ? > > [1] > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Important_bugs_and_issues_process
This looks excellent to me as a first pass. We can adjust as need be as we go. I'm a little worried about sending the message that bugs that don't make the list here aren't "important" to us in a wider sense... maybe we want something more neutral like "Prioritized Issues"? I know this is a little bikesheddy, but it'll be hard to change later. Also, I'd like to add the criteria: Issues eligible for this status would be those which do not necessarily fail a release criterion but which have critical impact on a Fedora Edition or on a council-approved Fedora Objective. Issues may also be nominated from the Common Bugs list when they are deemed by QA to have critical impact. to the page somewhere. -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
