----- Mail original ----- De: "Adam Williamson"
> Sure, it's arbitrary. Arbitrary doesn't necessarily mean 'bad'. The > 96dpi consensus worked perfectly well: hardware manufacturers knew what > sizes and resolutions to make their monitors That's pretty disingenious. Hardware manufacturers have not produced 96dpi laptops for years and the same people that worship the 96 dpi holy cow will tell you desktops are deads and laptops the only present or future. 96dpi is a convenient "consensus" to avoid fixing the stack. And then newer entrants like Apple or Google show up having fixed *their* stack with dips and hidpi, and the emperor is naked. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
