On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 2:21 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:31:25PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: >> On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:18:38 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: >> > guild would be because it's a dep of a dep of gdb-headless >> guile >> >> libguile-2.0.so.22 is DT_NEEDED - as shown by ldd. >> >> Easy way would be to make gdb-headless a separate binary/build. >> >> Less easy way would be to dlopen() libguile from gdb and keep there some stub >> with dlsym()ed pointers to functions. Or maybe provide weak symbols all >> pointing to a function dlopen()ing libguile and so the weak symbols would get >> overriden by real symbols from libguile. Or is solved by some project? >> >> Not sure if that guile dependency is such an issue. > > Can't we instead add fake Provides: this-package-is-not-critpath > and ignore such packages from the script which makes them critpath? > This seems like a better solution than doing ugly things like dlopen > (and breaking automatic Requires, etc.)
Or just not care if they're critpath? I'm not sure what the problem is. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
