On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 01:31:25PM +0200, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Fri, 21 Oct 2016 13:18:38 +0200, Peter Robinson wrote: > > guild would be because it's a dep of a dep of gdb-headless > guile > > libguile-2.0.so.22 is DT_NEEDED - as shown by ldd. > > Easy way would be to make gdb-headless a separate binary/build. > > Less easy way would be to dlopen() libguile from gdb and keep there some stub > with dlsym()ed pointers to functions. Or maybe provide weak symbols all > pointing to a function dlopen()ing libguile and so the weak symbols would get > overriden by real symbols from libguile. Or is solved by some project? > > Not sure if that guile dependency is such an issue.
Can't we instead add fake Provides: this-package-is-not-critpath and ignore such packages from the script which makes them critpath? This seems like a better solution than doing ugly things like dlopen (and breaking automatic Requires, etc.) Zbyszek _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
