On Mon, Oct 03, 2016 at 02:35:00PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Another alternate here is that we could make taskotron a 'namespace' > like currently rpms/ and docker/ are. Then we would have > perhaps: /taskotron/rpms/foobar/ as the top level and all the rest is > the same. This would get us a seperate pkgdb entry for the taskotron > part of things (ie, it could have different maintainers, people allowed > to commit, etc). That would add to complexity however.
How much complexity in terms of ongoing maintenance? I think having different committers is a big plus. The big downside — other than complexity — is that the in-package-dist-git approach is very obvious to existing packagers, whereas the namespaces are still a sort of easter egg. Maybe we could do something in fedpkg to make it more discoverable? Also, if we do go with a separate namespace, how about "tests" instead of "taskotron", with tasktron a subdir of that, and "testcases" another (for https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues/942)? > Thanks for working on all this. It's awesome to see it start to come to > fruition! +1 -- Matthew Miller <mat...@fedoraproject.org> Fedora Project Leader _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
