On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 11:43:35AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 05:02:04PM +0200, Petr Šabata wrote: > > > This is for the labeling of, for example, separate PHP 5, 6, and 7 > > > modules? > > > > Yes. Or even variations of the same upstream version. > > > > I'm really pro-stream here because these identifiers have > > nothing to do with upgrade paths and some modules or module > > stacks wouldn't even have any concept of numbered, progressive > > builds/releases. It's just a label. > > > > I would save the word "version" to identify updates within > > these "streams". > > I agree on not using "version" for this. I'm not completely sold on > "stream", partly because we talk about "upstream" and "downstream" so > much, and this is unrelated to that. How about "branch"? That fits with > the idea of "rebase" for switching between them....
"Branch" is also fine, I'd say. Especially if you consider that's exactly how these are going to be developed -- branches in dist-git. Hmm... P
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
