On 09/09/2016 08:24 AM, Jerry James wrote: > There is no soname bump in this release, but one section of the API > changed in a backwards-incompatible way.
If they broke ABI, why wasn't the soname bumped? > If the suitesparse maintainer does not object, I would also like to > fix something I noticed in the build logs. GCC complains about > unrecognized pragmas. > - #pragma ivdep: I propose to change all instances of this to #pragma GCC > ivdep. > - #pragma novector: there is no GCC equivalent, so nothing can be done here. > - #pragma omp ...: I propose to build CHOLMOD with -fopenmp so these > will be defined and used. I'm concerned about this last change - if I understand it correctly everything that link to CHOLMOD will now need to use -fopenmp as well. I'm not necessarily opposed to this, but it does have larger ramifications. I know in various places libraries will provide both serial and openmp versions. I wonder if it's time for Fedora to work out a scheme for this, or perhaps simply embrace the multi-core age and accept openmp versions as standard. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA, Boulder/CoRA Office FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane or...@nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
