On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:10:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote: > > > > +1 > > > > The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons (as > > described above) are worse that living with original name, which is > > well-known, well-documented, and relied on. > > Another +1 here. I think the name should stay. Changing it brings no > significant benefits but will certainly break stuff, and render huge > amounts of existing information obsolete.
I happen to agree, but that argument was lost on the yum -> dnf rename. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
