On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Your argument sounds like yum.repos.d would be the best name for the
repo definitions that are recognised by the yum parser and other
implementations for this format.
More accurate and more distro agnostic would be <package management
system like rpm or npm etc >.repos.d or <file format like rpm, npm etc
>.repos.d not package management like yum, dnf, zypper etc could all
use that repository directory if that would be the case
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Package_management_system>
repos.d is to generic.
It's going to be interesting to see if fesco will be consistent in their
previous decision making or Red Hat NIH software of zypper will get the
special Red Hat corporate treatment from them.
JBG
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_format>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
