On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 11:07:39AM +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: >Am Dienstag, den 09.03.2010, 20:25 -0500 schrieb Seth Vidal: > >> I agree, there was obviously a divisive and destructive aspect to that >> meeting. >> >> Jonathan, Do you have any thoughts on what we can do to correct it? > >Seth, respect would be a good starting point. > >> 20:45:30 <cwickert> I know there are people that will leave Fedora if >> we decide a policy that forbids major updates. both users and >> contributors >> 20:45:42 <skvidal> cwickert: people threatening to leave should leave >> 20:45:48 <skvidal> orphan your packages and go >> 20:45:57 <skvidal> I'll be glad to clean up that mess
While the phrasing may or may not be over the top, I read that more as: "We shouldn't be held hostage to various threats. We shouldn't be afraid to try something because a vocal few are ranting against it." I could, of course, be very wrong. However threatening to leave the project if various things aren't done exactly one's way isn't very respectful either. josh -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
