lzma itself already replaced by xz-lzma-compat several months ago. xz-lzma-compat provides lzma=5.
在2010-02-13?02:10:23，"Milos?Jakubicek"?<xja...@fi.muni.cz>?写道： >Oh,?I?didn't?really?notice?how?your?repoquery?looks?like?before. >Libarchive?is?ok,?but?there?are?others: > >?>repoquery?--whatrequires?--alldeps?lzma?lzma-libs?lzma-devel? >--enablerepo=rawhide >rpm-build-0:4.7.1-6.fc12.x86_64 >rpm-build-0:4.8.0-9.fc13.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-25.fc12.x86_64 >autoarchive-0:0.1.2-2.fc12.noarch >rpm-build-0:4.7.2-1.fc12.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-22.fc12.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-26.fc13.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-24.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-libs-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-libs-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.i686 >lzma-devel-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-devel-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.i686 > >...which?need?to?be?sorted?out. > >CC'ing?autoarchive,?man?and?rpm?maintainers: > >Ivana,?Panu,?Fabian:?are?your?packages?able?to?use?xz?instead? >(I?guess?in?case?of?rpm?this?is?just?a?relict,?right?) > >In?all?cases?the?lzma?dependency?is?hardcoded,?can?hopefully?be?just? >removed. > >If?yes,?I?can?retire?lzma?as?soon?as?we?branch?F13. > >Milos > >On?12.2.2010?18:35,?Chen?Lei?wrote: >>?In?fact?libarchive?doesn't?require?lzma-libs?any?more?in?F12?and?F13. >>?For?F11: >>?repoquery?--whatrequires?libarchive.so.2 >>?PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.9-1.fc11.i586 >>?libarchive-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586 >>?kdeutils-6:4.2.2-4.fc11.i586 >>?PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.6-8.fc11.i586 >>?libarchive-devel-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586 >>?Updating?libarchive?to?the?F12?only?affects?a?few?stuffs(soname?unchanged). >> >>?在2010-02-13??01:02:56，"Milos??Jakubicek"??<xja...@fi.muni.cz??<mailto:xja...@fi.muni.cz>>??写道： >>>Hi??Chen, >>> >>>On??12.2.2010??12:50,??Chen??Lei??wrote: >>>>??I??realized??from??"http://tukaani.org/xz/"????the??core??of??the??xz??utils >>>>??compression??code??is??based??on??LZMA??SDK??<http://7-zip.org/sdk.html>,??but >>>>??it??has??been??modified??quite??a??lot??to??be??suitable??for??XZ??Utils. >>>>??So??I??think??we??should??ship??lzma??sdk??for??fedora??in??parallel??with??xz??utils >>>>??and??p7zip.??Since??xz??utils??are??the??successor??to??lzma??utils,??maybe??lzma >>>>??utils??can??be??safely??retired??in??fedora. >>> >>>Retiring??lzma??(completely)??is??a??long-term??plan,??yes??(I'm??the??maintainer >>>of??it).??Not??sure??about??the??right??time??--??F14? >>> >>>I'll??talk??to??the??libarchive??maintainer??--??any??other??objections??against >>>the??plan??to??retire??lzma??for??F14? >>> >>>Milos >> >> >> >> >> >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
