In fact libarchive doesn't require lzma-libs any more in F12 and F13. For F11: repoquery --whatrequires libarchive.so.2 PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.9-1.fc11.i586 libarchive-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586 kdeutils-6:4.2.2-4.fc11.i586 PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.6-8.fc11.i586 libarchive-devel-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586 Updating libarchive to the F12 only affects a few stuffs(soname unchanged).
在2010-02-13?01:02:56，"Milos?Jakubicek"?<xja...@fi.muni.cz>?写道： >Hi?Chen, > >On?12.2.2010?12:50,?Chen?Lei?wrote: >>?I?realized?from?"http://tukaani.org/xz/"??the?core?of?the?xz?utils >>?compression?code?is?based?on?LZMA?SDK?<http://7-zip.org/sdk.html>,?but >>?it?has?been?modified?quite?a?lot?to?be?suitable?for?XZ?Utils. >>?So?I?think?we?should?ship?lzma?sdk?for?fedora?in?parallel?with?xz?utils >>?and?p7zip.?Since?xz?utils?are?the?successor?to?lzma?utils,?maybe?lzma >>?utils?can?be?safely?retired?in?fedora. > >Retiring?lzma?(completely)?is?a?long-term?plan,?yes?(I'm?the?maintainer? >of?it).?Not?sure?about?the?right?time?--?F14? > >I'll?talk?to?the?libarchive?maintainer?--?any?other?objections?against? >the?plan?to?retire?lzma?for?F14? > >Milos
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
