[AMD Official Use Only - General]

Hi Ard,

Agree with you, reverting code looks not a good way now. We will think about 
new method to resolve this issue. Just need a bit more time and I will hold on 
checking in code to VanGoghBoard before it.
Thanks again for your suggestion and help us improve code in VanGoghBoard.

Thanks,
Eric


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel <a...@kernel.org>
> Sent: Friday, April 19, 2024 5:25 PM
> To: Xing, Eric <eric.x...@amd.com>
> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Zhai, MingXin (Duke) <duke.z...@amd.com>;
> Lendacky, Thomas <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>; Chang, Abner
> <abner.ch...@amd.com>; Yao, Ken <ken....@amd.com>; Roth, Michael
> <michael.r...@amd.com>; Attar, AbdulLateef (Abdul Lateef)
> <abdullateef.at...@amd.com>; Ard Biesheuvel
> <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>; Min
> Xu <min.m...@intel.com>; Leif Lindholm <quic_llind...@quicinc.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Platform/AMD: Add AmdSvsmLib to
> required DSC files
>
> Caution: This message originated from an External Source. Use proper
> caution when opening attachments, clicking links, or responding.
>
>
> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 at 11:06, Xing, Eric <eric.x...@amd.com> wrote:
> >
> > [AMD Official Use Only - General]
> >
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > This checkin causes VanGoghBoard build fail now. Would you help revert it?
> > I will merge PATCH to VanGoghBoard after the code review process done
> and code changes are verified pass on real board.
> >
>
> Please provide a solution instead that makes upstream edk2 work with
> upstream edk2-platforms.
>
> For downstream builds, you can combine the old EDK2_202208 with an older
> checkout of edk2-platforms, right?


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#118019): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/118019
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/105537744/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to