Why do you add the sort logic?
I thought you might have further changes to remove some unnecessary logic that
deals with un-sorted array.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray
> Sent: Friday, June 2, 2023 11:34 AM
> To: Tan, Dun <dun....@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Kumar, Rahul R
> <rahul.r.ku...@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> Subject: RE: [Patch V4 13/15] UefiCpuPkg: Sort mProtectionMemRange when
> ReadyToLock
>
> Similar comments as patch #12.
> You could avoid pool allocation.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tan, Dun <dun....@intel.com>
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 16, 2023 6:00 PM
> > To: devel@edk2.groups.io
> > Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; Kumar,
> Rahul
> > R <rahul.r.ku...@intel.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> > Subject: [Patch V4 13/15] UefiCpuPkg: Sort mProtectionMemRange when
> > ReadyToLock
> >
> > Sort mProtectionMemRange in InitProtectedMemRange() when
> > ReadyToLock.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Dun Tan <dun....@intel.com>
> > Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Ray Ni <ray...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Rahul Kumar <rahul1.ku...@intel.com>
> > Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
> > ---
> > UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.c | 35
> > +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.c
> > b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.c
> > index 5625ba0cac..b298e2fb99 100644
> > --- a/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.c
> > +++ b/UefiCpuPkg/PiSmmCpuDxeSmm/SmmProfile.c
> > @@ -375,6 +375,32 @@ IsAddressSplit (
> > return FALSE;
> > }
> >
> > +/**
> > + Function to compare 2 MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE based on range base.
> > +
> > + @param[in] Buffer1 pointer to Device Path poiner to compare
> > + @param[in] Buffer2 pointer to second DevicePath pointer to
> > compare
> > +
> > + @retval 0 Buffer1 equal to Buffer2
> > + @retval <0 Buffer1 is less than Buffer2
> > + @retval >0 Buffer1 is greater than Buffer2
> > +**/
> > +INTN
> > +EFIAPI
> > +ProtectionRangeCompare (
> > + IN CONST VOID *Buffer1,
> > + IN CONST VOID *Buffer2
> > + )
> > +{
> > + if (((MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE *)Buffer1)->Range.Base >
> > ((MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE *)Buffer2)->Range.Base) {
> > + return 1;
> > + } else if (((MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE *)Buffer1)->Range.Base <
> > ((MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE *)Buffer2)->Range.Base) {
> > + return -1;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > /**
> > Initialize the protected memory ranges and the 4KB-page mapped memory
> > ranges.
> >
> > @@ -397,6 +423,7 @@ InitProtectedMemRange (
> > EFI_PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Base2MBAlignedAddress;
> > UINT64 High4KBPageSize;
> > UINT64 Low4KBPageSize;
> > + VOID *Buffer;
> >
> > NumberOfDescriptors = 0;
> > NumberOfAddedDescriptors = mSmmCpuSmramRangeCount;
> > @@ -533,6 +560,14 @@ InitProtectedMemRange (
> >
> > mSplitMemRangeCount = NumberOfSpliteRange;
> >
> > + //
> > + // Sort the mProtectionMemRange
> > + //
> > + Buffer = AllocateZeroPool (sizeof (MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE));
> > + ASSERT (Buffer != NULL);
> > + QuickSort (mProtectionMemRange, mProtectionMemRangeCount, sizeof
> > (MEMORY_PROTECTION_RANGE),
> > (BASE_SORT_COMPARE)ProtectionRangeCompare, Buffer);
> > + FreePool (Buffer);
> > +
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "SMM Profile Memory Ranges:\n"));
> > for (Index = 0; Index < mProtectionMemRangeCount; Index++) {
> > DEBUG ((DEBUG_INFO, "mProtectionMemRange[%d].Base = %lx\n", Index,
> > mProtectionMemRange[Index].Range.Base));
> > --
> > 2.31.1.windows.1
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#105626): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/105626
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98922941/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe:
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
