On Wed, Apr 05, 2023 at 01:37:23AM +0000, Yao, Jiewen wrote:
> Hi
> This is follow up for the "Openssl1.1 replacement proposal" 
> https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/topic/96741156.
> openssl 3.0 POC result is shown at 
> https://github.com/tianocore/edk2-staging/blob/OpenSSL11_EOL/CryptoPkg/Readme-OpenSSL3.0.md
> The size increase is reduced to ~10%.
> 
> In order to achieve maximum size optimization for openssl 3.0, we updated 
> openssl 3.0 branch and recorded to 
> https://github.com/liyi77/openssl/tree/openssl-3.0-POC.
> To help the community review and feedback the openssl 3.0 change and plan to 
> openssl upstream in the future, we should avoid personal branch usage.

I fail to see the point.  To get the openssl changes merged upstream
you needed engage with the openssl community, and I don't see how a
tianocore openssl repository helps with that.

Now that the changes needed have been identified I'd strongly suggest
to focus on getting the changes merged to upstream openssl instead of
storing them in a tianocore fork.

take care,
  Gerd



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102553): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102553
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/98074585/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to