On Mon, Apr 03, 2023 at 05:33:10AM -0600, Rebecca Cran wrote: > On 4/3/23 5:30 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > > I'm wondering what the point in keeping a known-broken toolchain though. > > It is apparently unused when nobody noticed the breakage ... > > I agree. At this point I want to reach a consensus and get this patch series > committed, even if that means leaving a known broken toolchain around.
Sure. That question was meant more for gaoliming who expressed interest in keeping it. gaoliming? I'd prefer to keep GCC only. In case we decide to keep both LTO and non-LTO variants the GCC + GCCNOLTE naming scheme looks fine to me. take care, Gerd -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#102392): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102392 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97919856/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
