On 3/29/23 1:39 AM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
Could we perhaps do
GCC49 -> GCC
GCC5 -> GCCLTO
?
As with CLANG35/38, the GCCx names have become rather obsolete, so I'd
prefer to have a set of more generic names, and a sliding window of
supported versions that can be documented in tools_def.template (and
updated at times)
We need a minimum of GCC 6 to run CI because
UnitTestFrameworkPkg/Library/GoogleTestLib uses nullptr that GCC 5
doesn't support, so the GCC5 name is wrong anyway.
--
Rebecca Cran
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102110): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102110
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97923603/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
