> -----Original Message-----
> From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Ard
> Biesheuvel
> Sent: Friday, March 31, 2023 6:13 PM
> To: devel@edk2.groups.io; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>
> Cc: Andrew Fish <af...@apple.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Liu, Zhiguang <zhiguang....@intel.com>;
> Rebecca Cran <rebe...@bsdio.com>; Tom Lendacky
> <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>; Marvin Häuser <mhaeu...@posteo.de>
> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [RFT PATCH v3 2/5]
> UefiCpuPkg/CpuExceptionHandlerLib: Use single SEC/PEI version
> 
> On Fri, 31 Mar 2023 at 11:56, Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > Ard,
> > Thanks for the detailed commit messages. That really helps me to
> understand why XCODE version
> > was needed.
> >
> > However, I feel it would be great if you can "highlight" what are changed by
> this patch.
> > The following is just an example. You can reword as you like.
> >
> > 1. Change for non-XCODE SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib:
> >    * Use SecPeiExceptionHandlerAsm.nasm (renamed from
> ExceptionHandlerAsm.nasm)
> >    * Removed some unnecessary absolute references
> >    * (32 IDT stubs are still in .text.)
> 
> Indeed
> 
> > 2. Change for XCODE SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib:
> >    * Use SecPeiExceptionHandlerAsm.nasm instead of
> Xcode5ExceptionHandlerAsm.nasm
> >    * CET logic is not in SecPeiExceptionHandlerAsm.nasm (but aligns to non-
> XCODE lib instance)
> 
> No, this does not actually change in this patch. The CET logic does
> not exist in the generic SecPei version either before or after this
> patch.

Because of this patch, CET logic is removed from XCODE 
SecPeiCpuExceptionHandlerLib.


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#102287): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/102287
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97969650/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: 
https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/leave/9847357/21656/1706620634/xyzzy 
[arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to