Yes, you are right. Tested on the H/W, It clears the upper 32bits. đ From: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> On Behalf Of Marvin HĂ€user Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2023 3:07 PM To: S, Ashraf Ali <ashraf.al...@intel.com> Cc: devel@edk2.groups.io; Chiu, Chasel <chasel.c...@intel.com>; Desimone, Nathaniel L <nathaniel.l.desim...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] IntelFsp2Pkg: Fix NASM X64 build warnings.
Yes - it does. Most (if not all?) operations on 32-bit registers zero-extend the corresponding 64-bit register. This is an AMD64 / Intel 64 design to combat partial register stall. Please consult the SDM (or at least try it out). What I didnât realize is that âmov eax, eaxâ apparently defeats register renaming optimisations: https://stackoverflow.com/a/45660140 Best regards, Marvin On 19. Mar 2023, at 10:07, S, Ashraf Ali <ashraf.al...@intel.com<mailto:ashraf.al...@intel.com>> wrote: ï»ż Hi., Nope, it will not clear the upper 32bit right. From: Marvin HĂ€user <mhaeu...@posteo.de<mailto:mhaeu...@posteo.de>> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2023 3:38 AM To: S, Ashraf Ali <ashraf.al...@intel.com<mailto:ashraf.al...@intel.com>>; devel@edk2.groups.io<mailto:devel@edk2.groups.io> Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] [PATCH v2] IntelFsp2Pkg: Fix NASM X64 build warnings. Hi Ashraf, âmov eax, eaxâ does clear the high 32 Bits of rax. Best regards, Marvin -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#101369): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/101369 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/97678369/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-