Hi Ray, 

Both is fine to me, one thought is that we must have one CPU, so change to 1 
and I also checked some existing usage cases like the 
EFI_SMRAM_HOB_DESCRIPTOR_BLOCK.Descriptor, WIN_CERTIFICATE_UEFI_GUID. CertData, 
it also the same way.

Thanks,
Jiaxin 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>
> Sent: Friday, February 10, 2023 3:15 PM
> To: Wu, Jiaxin <jiaxin...@intel.com>; devel@edk2.groups.io
> Cc: Dong, Eric <eric.d...@intel.com>; Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com>;
> Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>; Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>;
> Kumar, Rahul R <rahul.r.ku...@intel.com>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH v4 2/5] UefiCpuPkg/SmmBaseHob.h: Add SMM Base
> HOB Data
> 
> Jiaxin,
> > +  ///
> > +  /// Pointer to SmBase address for each Processors.
> > +  ///
> > +  UINT64    SmBase[1];
> 
> Why SmBase[1] instead of SmBase[0]?
> I think using SmBase[0] can better help C code to calculate the HOB size.
> Simply sizeof (SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA) * sizeof (UINT64) * CpuCount,
> instead of sizeof (SMM_BASE_HOB_DATA) * sizeof (UINT64) * (CpuCount -
> 1).
> 



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#99964): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/99964
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/96871372/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to