Min: Thanks for the update. I have no other comments for MdePkg changes in this patch set.
Thanks Liming > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: [email protected] <[email protected]> 代表 Min Xu > 发送时间: 2022年10月25日 9:08 > 收件人: Dionna Amalie Glaze <[email protected]>; Gao, Liming > <[email protected]> > 抄送: [email protected]; Gao, Zhichao <[email protected]>; Ni, Ray > <[email protected]>; Aktas, Erdem <[email protected]>; Gerd > Hoffmann <[email protected]>; James Bottomley <[email protected]>; > Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; Tom Lendacky > <[email protected]>; Gao, Jiaqi <[email protected]>; Wang, Jian > J <[email protected]>; Liu, Zhiguang <[email protected]>; Kinney, > Michael D <[email protected]>; Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]>; > Xu, Min M <[email protected]> > 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [PATCH V4 00/10] Introduce Lazy-accept for > Tdx guest > > Hi, Liming > In Dionna's latest patch-sets the name of accept_all_unaccepted_memory > has been changed to BZ3987_MEMORY_ACCEPTANCE_PROTOCOL. > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95525 > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95530 > > So now these 2 protocols are named as > "BZ3987_MEMORY_ACCEPTANCE_PROTOCOL" and " > EDKII_MEMORY_ACCEPT_PROTOCOL". > Do you think they have addressed your concern? > > Thanks > Min > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dionna Amalie Glaze <[email protected]> > > Sent: Friday, October 21, 2022 11:59 PM > > To: Xu, Min M <[email protected]> > > Cc: [email protected]; Gao, Liming <[email protected]>; Gao, > > Zhichao <[email protected]>; Ni, Ray <[email protected]>; Aktas, > Erdem > > <[email protected]>; Gerd Hoffmann <[email protected]>; James > > Bottomley <[email protected]>; Yao, Jiewen <[email protected]>; > Tom > > Lendacky <[email protected]>; Gao, Jiaqi <[email protected]>; > > Wang, Jian J <[email protected]>; Liu, Zhiguang > > <[email protected]>; Kinney, Michael D > <[email protected]>; > > Ard Biesheuvel <[email protected]> > > Subject: Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [PATCH V4 00/10] Introduce Lazy-accept > for > > Tdx guest > > > > > > Min: > > > > I understand that they are for the different purpose and usage. > > > > But, their protocol name are very similar. > > > Yes. They do look very similar. > > > > > > > If there is no better protocol name, I will also be fine. > > > Dionna, what's your thought? > > > > > > > The accept_all_unaccepted_memory name came from Ard's suggestion on > > an earlier patch series where I was using a Pcd. > > We're talking about the name over on the spec bug > > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3987#c26 > > > > I think that any name concerning unaccepted memory is going to look a little > > same-y to others, so it's going to be troublesome if we require that they > > all > > strongly differ in name. I'm not strongly attached to the name, I just want > > to > > be conservative about what the name implies about the expected overall > > behavior of the system when that has not actually been decided upon. > > > > -- > > -Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her) > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#95586): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95586 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/94573125/21656 Group Owner: [email protected] Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [[email protected]] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
