Min: I understand that they are for the different purpose and usage. But, their protocol name are very similar. If there is no better protocol name, I will also be fine.
Thanks Liming > -----邮件原件----- > 发件人: devel@edk2.groups.io <devel@edk2.groups.io> 代表 Min Xu > 发送时间: 2022年10月18日 9:13 > 收件人: devel@edk2.groups.io; Gao, Liming <gaolim...@byosoft.com.cn> > 抄送: Gao, Zhichao <zhichao....@intel.com>; Ni, Ray <ray...@intel.com>; > Aktas, Erdem <erdemak...@google.com>; 'Gerd Hoffmann' > <kra...@redhat.com>; 'James Bottomley' <j...@linux.ibm.com>; Yao, Jiewen > <jiewen....@intel.com>; 'Tom Lendacky' <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>; > Gao, Jiaqi <jiaqi....@intel.com>; Wang, Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>; Liu, > Zhiguang <zhiguang....@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D > <michael.d.kin...@intel.com> > 主题: Re: [edk2-devel] 回复: [PATCH V4 00/10] Introduce Lazy-accept for > Tdx guest > > On October 10, 2022 10:28 AM, Gao Liming wrote: > > > > Min: > > I have no comments for new unaccepted resource type and unaccepted > gcd > > type. In fact, they are mapping to UEFI EfiUnacceptedMemoryType. > > > > For new protocol EfiMemoryAcceptProtocol, I see another patch serial > > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/94763 base on it to introduce > > ACCEPT_ALL_UNACCEPTED_MEMORY_PROTOCOL. Can these two > protocols > > be combined into one? > > > HI, Liming > There are below discussions about your comments. > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/94869 > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/94944 > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95050 > https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95109 > > Do you think these discussions address your comments? > > Thanks > Min > > > > -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#95350): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/95350 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/94422345/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
