> Generally, we tend to rely on the DEC default for new PCDs if we're
> not deviating from it.
> If there is no specific reason to deviate from this here, I think we
> can drop this patch.
>
> Or is this also needed to declare them as the right type? In that
> case, I think you can drop the hunks that touch non-CC platforms.
>

I probably did something wrong. Without this patch, the protocol patch
with PcdSetBoolS fails to build.

INFO - In file included from
/usr/local/google/home/dionnaglaze/gitrepos/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/DEBUG_GCC5/X64/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain/DEBUG/AutoGen.h:17,
INFO -                  from <command-line>:
INFO - 
/usr/local/google/home/dionnaglaze/gitrepos/edk2/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c:
In function ‘CoreEnableUnacceptedMemory’:
INFO - 
/usr/local/google/home/dionnaglaze/gitrepos/edk2/MdePkg/Include/Library/PcdLib.h:549:40:
error: implicit declaration of function
‘_PCD_SET_MODE_BOOL_S_PcdAcceptAllUnacceptedMemory’
[-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
INFO -   549 | #define PcdSetBoolS(TokenName, Value)
_PCD_SET_MODE_BOOL_S_##TokenName    ((Value))
INFO -       |                                        ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
INFO - 
/usr/local/google/home/dionnaglaze/gitrepos/edk2/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Mem/Page.c:2232:10:
note: in expansion of macro ‘PcdSetBoolS’
INFO -  2232 |   return PcdSetBoolS(PcdAcceptAllUnacceptedMemory, FALSE);
INFO -       |          ^~~~~~~~~~~
INFO - cc1: all warnings being treated as errors
INFO - make: *** [GNUmakefile:452:
/usr/local/google/home/dionnaglaze/gitrepos/edk2/Build/OvmfX64/DEBUG_GCC5/X64/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/DxeMain/OUTPUT/Mem/Page.obj]
Error 1
INFO -

What's the right way to do this?

-- 
-Dionna Glaze, PhD (she/her)


-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#94530): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/94530
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/93975248/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to