Replaced UNREACHABLE with ASSERT (FALSE) in case of new checksum
algorithms, due to it is an invariant violation rather than unreachable
path

Cc: Marvin Häuser <mhaeu...@posteo.de>
Cc: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falc...@gmail.com>
Cc: Vitaly Cheptsov <vit9...@protonmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Savva Mitrofanov <savva...@gmail.com>
---
 Features/Ext4Pkg/Ext4Dxe/Superblock.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/Features/Ext4Pkg/Ext4Dxe/Superblock.c 
b/Features/Ext4Pkg/Ext4Dxe/Superblock.c
index 47fc3a65507a..42762b6aa780 100644
--- a/Features/Ext4Pkg/Ext4Dxe/Superblock.c
+++ b/Features/Ext4Pkg/Ext4Dxe/Superblock.c
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@ Ext4CalculateChecksum (
       // For some reason, EXT4 really likes non-inverted CRC32C checksums, so 
we stick to that here.

       return ~CalculateCrc32c(Buffer, Length, ~InitialValue);

     default:

-      UNREACHABLE ();

+      ASSERT (FALSE);

       return 0;

   }

 }

-- 
2.37.0



-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#91650): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/91650
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/92531466/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-


Reply via email to