On 5/11/21 6:55 AM, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
> I don't fully understand the updates in this patch:
>
> On 05/07/21 22:38, Brijesh Singh wrote:
>> BZ:
>> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fbugzilla.tianocore.org%2Fshow_bug.cgi%3Fid%3D3275&data=04%7C01%7Cbrijesh.singh%40amd.com%7Cc383d8fdc1264644760508d91473b003%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637563309382960811%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=M3xHM2yU0m3VtPn1xGe1k5Wq0d6Vbdf9gMqDX1NxpgA%3D&reserved=0
>>
>> The Flush parameter is used to provide a hint whether the specified range
>> is Mmio address. Now that we have a dedicated helper to clear the
>> memory encryption mask for the Mmio address range, its safe to remove the
>> Flush parameter from MemEncryptSev{Set,Clear}PageEncMask().
> This looks good; it matches my request (1) from:
>
> https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flistman.redhat.com%2Farchives%2Fedk2-devel-archive%2F2021-May%2Fmsg00109.html&data=04%7C01%7Cbrijesh.singh%40amd.com%7Cc383d8fdc1264644760508d91473b003%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637563309382960811%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=3TQrliMABDaa%2FtCN%2FvKewTmLfVRKIou2La5yRGGyzJY%3D&reserved=0
>
>> Cc: James Bottomley <j...@linux.ibm.com>
>> Cc: Min Xu <min.m...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
>> Cc: Tom Lendacky <thomas.lenda...@amd.com>
>> Cc: Jordan Justen <jordan.l.jus...@intel.com>
>> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb+tianoc...@kernel.org>
>> Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
>> Cc: Erdem Aktas <erdemak...@google.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Brijesh Singh <brijesh.si...@amd.com>
>> ---
>> OvmfPkg/Include/Library/MemEncryptSevLib.h | 10 ++----
>> .../BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/VirtualMemory.h | 10 ++----
>> OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.c | 3 +-
>> OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe/AmdSevIoMmu.c | 6 ++--
>> .../Ia32/MemEncryptSevLib.c | 10 ++----
>> .../X64/MemEncryptSevLib.c | 16 +++-------
>> .../X64/PeiDxeVirtualMemory.c | 32 +++++++++++--------
>> .../X64/SecVirtualMemory.c | 8 ++---
>> .../SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c | 3 +-
>> OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/AmdSev.c | 3 +-
>> 10 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 66 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Include/Library/MemEncryptSevLib.h
>> b/OvmfPkg/Include/Library/MemEncryptSevLib.h
>> index b91490d5d44d..76d06c206c8b 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Include/Library/MemEncryptSevLib.h
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Include/Library/MemEncryptSevLib.h
>> @@ -100,8 +100,6 @@ MemEncryptSevIsEnabled (
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] NumPages The number of pages from start memory
>> region.
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before clearing the
>> bit
>> - (mostly TRUE except MMIO addresses)
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -114,8 +112,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BaseAddress,
>> - IN UINTN NumPages,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN NumPages
>> );
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -128,8 +125,6 @@ MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] NumPages The number of pages from start memory
>> region.
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before setting the
>> bit
>> - (mostly TRUE except MMIO addresses)
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were set for the memory
>> region.
>> @@ -142,8 +137,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> MemEncryptSevSetPageEncMask (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BaseAddress,
>> - IN UINTN NumPages,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN NumPages
>> );
>>
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/VirtualMemory.h
>> b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/VirtualMemory.h
>> index 8dc39e647b90..21bbbd1c4f9c 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/VirtualMemory.h
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/VirtualMemory.h
>> @@ -58,8 +58,6 @@ InternalGetMemEncryptionAddressMask (
>> @param[in] PhysicalAddress The physical address that is the start
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] Length The length of memory region
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before applying the
>> - encryption mask
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -72,8 +70,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> - IN UINTN Length,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN Length
>> );
>>
>> /**
>> @@ -85,8 +82,6 @@ InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> @param[in] PhysicalAddress The physical address that is the start
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] Length The length of memory region
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before applying the
>> - encryption mask
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were set for the memory
>> region.
>> @@ -99,8 +94,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> - IN UINTN Length,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN Length
>> );
>>
>> /**
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.c b/OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.c
>> index 80831b81facf..41e4b291d070 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/AmdSevDxe/AmdSevDxe.c
>> @@ -120,8 +120,7 @@ AmdSevDxeEntryPoint (
>> Status = MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> 0, // Cr3BaseAddress -- use current CR3
>> MapPagesBase, // BaseAddress
>> - MapPagesCount, // NumPages
>> - TRUE // Flush
>> + MapPagesCount // NumPages
>> );
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask(): %r\n",
> (1) You missed my comment (2) in
> <https://nam11.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Flistman.redhat.com%2Farchives%2Fedk2-devel-archive%2F2021-May%2Fmsg00109.html&data=04%7C01%7Cbrijesh.singh%40amd.com%7Cc383d8fdc1264644760508d91473b003%7C3dd8961fe4884e608e11a82d994e183d%7C0%7C0%7C637563309382960811%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=3TQrliMABDaa%2FtCN%2FvKewTmLfVRKIou2La5yRGGyzJY%3D&reserved=0>.
Ah, I will fix in rev2.
>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe/AmdSevIoMmu.c b/OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe/AmdSevIoMmu.c
>> index 49ffa2448811..b30628078f73 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe/AmdSevIoMmu.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/IoMmuDxe/AmdSevIoMmu.c
>> @@ -252,8 +252,7 @@ IoMmuMap (
>> Status = MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> 0,
>> MapInfo->PlainTextAddress,
>> - MapInfo->NumberOfPages,
>> - TRUE
>> + MapInfo->NumberOfPages
>> );
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> @@ -407,8 +406,7 @@ IoMmuUnmapWorker (
>> Status = MemEncryptSevSetPageEncMask (
>> 0,
>> MapInfo->PlainTextAddress,
>> - MapInfo->NumberOfPages,
>> - TRUE
>> + MapInfo->NumberOfPages
>> );
>> ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/Ia32/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/Ia32/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> index 169d3118e44f..be260e0d1014 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/Ia32/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/Ia32/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> @@ -25,8 +25,6 @@
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] NumPages The number of pages from start memory
>> region.
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before clearing the
>> bit
>> - (mostly TRUE except MMIO addresses)
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -39,8 +37,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BaseAddress,
>> - IN UINTN NumPages,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN NumPages
>> )
>> {
>> //
>> @@ -59,8 +56,6 @@ MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] NumPages The number of pages from start memory
>> region.
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before setting the
>> bit
>> - (mostly TRUE except MMIO addresses)
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were set for the memory
>> region.
>> @@ -73,8 +68,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> MemEncryptSevSetPageEncMask (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BaseAddress,
>> - IN UINTN NumPages,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN NumPages
>> )
>> {
>> //
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> index a2bf698bcde7..a57e8fd37fa7 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/MemEncryptSevLib.c
>> @@ -27,8 +27,6 @@
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] NumPages The number of pages from start memory
>> region.
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before clearing the
>> bit
>> - (mostly TRUE except MMIO addresses)
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -41,15 +39,13 @@ EFIAPI
>> MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BaseAddress,
>> - IN UINTN NumPages,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN NumPages
>> )
>> {
>> return InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> Cr3BaseAddress,
>> BaseAddress,
>> - EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (NumPages),
>> - Flush
>> + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (NumPages)
>> );
>> }
>>
>> @@ -63,8 +59,6 @@ MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] NumPages The number of pages from start memory
>> region.
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before setting the
>> bit
>> - (mostly TRUE except MMIO addresses)
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were set for the memory
>> region.
>> @@ -77,15 +71,13 @@ EFIAPI
>> MemEncryptSevSetPageEncMask (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS BaseAddress,
>> - IN UINTN NumPages,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN NumPages
>> )
>> {
>> return InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted (
>> Cr3BaseAddress,
>> BaseAddress,
>> - EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (NumPages),
>> - Flush
>> + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (NumPages)
>> );
>> }
>>
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/PeiDxeVirtualMemory.c
>> b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/PeiDxeVirtualMemory.c
>> index a18d336a8789..ad1021bd3e43 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/PeiDxeVirtualMemory.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/PeiDxeVirtualMemory.c
>> @@ -555,8 +555,7 @@ EnableReadOnlyPageWriteProtect (
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] Length The length of memory region
>> @param[in] Mode Set or Clear mode
>> - @param[in] CacheFlush Flush the caches before applying the
>> - encryption mask
>> + @param[in] Mmio The physical address range is Mmio.
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -572,7 +571,7 @@ SetMemoryEncDec (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> IN UINTN Length,
>> IN MAP_RANGE_MODE Mode,
>> - IN BOOLEAN CacheFlush
>> + IN BOOLEAN Mmio
>> )
>> {
>> PAGE_MAP_AND_DIRECTORY_POINTER *PageMapLevel4Entry;
>> @@ -585,12 +584,23 @@ SetMemoryEncDec (
>> UINT64 AddressEncMask;
>> BOOLEAN IsWpEnabled;
>> RETURN_STATUS Status;
>> + BOOLEAN CacheFlush;
>>
>> //
>> // Set PageMapLevel4Entry to suppress incorrect compiler/analyzer
>> warnings.
>> //
>> PageMapLevel4Entry = NULL;
>>
>> + //
>> + // The cache need to flushed for the non-Mmio address range.
>> + //
>> + if (Mmio == TRUE) {
>> + CacheFlush = FALSE;
>> + } else {
>> + CacheFlush = TRUE;
>> + }
>> +
>> + //
>> DEBUG ((
>> DEBUG_VERBOSE,
>> "%a:%a: Cr3Base=0x%Lx Physical=0x%Lx Length=0x%Lx Mode=%a
>> CacheFlush=%u\n",
> (2) The calculation of "CacheFlush" from "Mmio" is awkward. First, we
> don't compare BOOLEANs against TRUE or FALSE, BOOLEANs just stand alone
> in controlling expression (or otherwise "logical") context. Second, why
> not just write:
>
> CacheFlush = !Mmio;
>
> But even so...
>
> (3) ... The introduction of the "Mmio" parameter is inexplicable to me.
> It apparently replaces CacheFlush (with inverse meaning), but neither
> the commit message, nor the (RFCv2 -> PATCH) changelog, explain why this
> replacement makes sense.
The internal function is used for clearing the mask for both system RAM
as well as Mmio, so we need a way to tell the internal function that
call is for the Mmio range. I thought making all the changes in a single
file makes sense but I see it can get harder for the review. I guess I
could split the work in two patches
1) Drop the cache flush param from high level
MemEncryptSev{Set,Clear}PageEncMask and don't touch anything in the
SetMemoryEncDec()
2) Rename the Flush parameter to Mmio in the SetMemoryEncDec()
Does it makes sense to you ?
>
> The SetMemoryEncDec() function is an internal function (not a library
> class API), so this change doesn't necessarily conflict with the commit
> message -- but having this change in this particular patch (the last
> patch in the series) seems unjustified.
>
> In the previous version, we updated two SetMemoryEncDec() call sites: in
> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted() and
> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted(), we replaced the forwarding of
> "Flush" with TRUE constants.
>
> In this version, we update *three* SetMemoryEncDec() call sites:
>
> - in InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted() and
> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted(), we replace the forwarding of
> "Flush" with FALSE constants,
>
> - and in InternalMemEncryptSevClearMmioPageEncMask(), we replace the
> *constant* FALSE with TRUE.
>
> I think this very last point -- regarding
> InternalMemEncryptSevClearMmioPageEncMask() -- shows that the
> replacement of CacheFlush with Mmio, at this point in the series, is
> unwarranted.
>
> Minimally, this replacement / negation should be a separate patch, but
> even then, I think we'd need a defensible purpose (which is not clear to
> me at this point); *plus*, the "re-calculation" of CacheFlush inside
> SetMemoryEncDec() from Mmio feels like a cop-out. It's only being done
> to save some additional replacements in the patch, but it leaves us with
> a stricly worse -- harder to understand -- function. If you really need
> this replacement / negation, then please do it in a separate patch, with
> a good commit message; furthermore, please replace CacheFlush
> *completely*, in SetMemoryEncDec() -- please don't reintroduce it.
>
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
>
>
>> @@ -828,8 +838,6 @@ SetMemoryEncDec (
>> @param[in] PhysicalAddress The physical address that is the start
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] Length The length of memory region
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before applying the
>> - encryption mask
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -842,8 +850,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> - IN UINTN Length,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN Length
>> )
>> {
>>
>> @@ -852,7 +859,7 @@ InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> PhysicalAddress,
>> Length,
>> ClearCBit,
>> - Flush
>> + FALSE
>> );
>> }
>>
>> @@ -865,8 +872,6 @@ InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> @param[in] PhysicalAddress The physical address that is the start
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] Length The length of memory region
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before applying the
>> - encryption mask
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were set for the memory
>> region.
>> @@ -879,8 +884,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> - IN UINTN Length,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN Length
>> )
>> {
>> return SetMemoryEncDec (
>> @@ -888,7 +892,7 @@ InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted (
>> PhysicalAddress,
>> Length,
>> SetCBit,
>> - Flush
>> + FALSE
>> );
>> }
>>
>> @@ -921,6 +925,6 @@ InternalMemEncryptSevClearMmioPageEncMask (
>> PhysicalAddress,
>> Length,
>> ClearCBit,
>> - FALSE
>> + TRUE
>> );
>> }
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/SecVirtualMemory.c
>> b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/SecVirtualMemory.c
>> index bca5e3febb1b..24d19d3ca161 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/SecVirtualMemory.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/BaseMemEncryptSevLib/X64/SecVirtualMemory.c
>> @@ -42,8 +42,6 @@ InternalGetMemEncryptionAddressMask (
>> @param[in] PhysicalAddress The physical address that is the start
>> address of a memory region.
>> @param[in] Length The length of memory region
>> - @param[in] Flush Flush the caches before applying the
>> - encryption mask
>>
>> @retval RETURN_SUCCESS The attributes were cleared for the
>> memory region.
>> @@ -56,8 +54,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryDecrypted (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> - IN UINTN Length,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN Length
>> )
>> {
>> //
>> @@ -89,8 +86,7 @@ EFIAPI
>> InternalMemEncryptSevSetMemoryEncrypted (
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS Cr3BaseAddress,
>> IN PHYSICAL_ADDRESS PhysicalAddress,
>> - IN UINTN Length,
>> - IN BOOLEAN Flush
>> + IN UINTN Length
>> )
>> {
>> //
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c
>> b/OvmfPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c
>> index fdf2380974fa..c7cc5b0389c8 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/Library/SmmCpuFeaturesLib/SmmCpuFeaturesLib.c
>> @@ -283,8 +283,7 @@ SmmCpuFeaturesSmmRelocationComplete (
>> Status = MemEncryptSevSetPageEncMask (
>> 0, // Cr3BaseAddress -- use current CR3
>> MapPagesBase, // BaseAddress
>> - MapPagesCount, // NumPages
>> - TRUE // Flush
>> + MapPagesCount // NumPages
>> );
>> if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>> DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "%a: MemEncryptSevSetPageEncMask(): %r\n",
>> diff --git a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/AmdSev.c b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/AmdSev.c
>> index dddffdebda4b..a8bf610022ba 100644
>> --- a/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/AmdSev.c
>> +++ b/OvmfPkg/PlatformPei/AmdSev.c
>> @@ -72,8 +72,7 @@ AmdSevEsInitialize (
>> DecryptStatus = MemEncryptSevClearPageEncMask (
>> 0,
>> GhcbBasePa + EFI_PAGES_TO_SIZE (PageCount),
>> - 1,
>> - TRUE
>> + 1
>> );
>> ASSERT_RETURN_ERROR (DecryptStatus);
>> }
>>
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#75024): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/75024
Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/82665196/21656
Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io
Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
