On 07/15/20 19:09, Vladimir Olovyannikov wrote: > Hi Laszlo, > > Thank you for supporting this. > I can add required support.
Thanks! > But shouldn't we wait until the patch is reviewed and approved first? > I don't know the proper procedure. Please advise. If a v4 of your patch becomes necessary, based on the ShellPkg maintainers' review, then my suggestion would be to send v4 as a patch series, not as a single patch. The v4 1/3 patch would be the current patch (with updates as requested by the ShellPkg reviewers). The v4 2/3 patch would extend ArmVirtPkg to include the new dynamic command. The v4 3/3 patch would do the same for OvmfPkg. If a v4 of your patch turns out to be unnecessary (i.e., in case the ShellPkg maintainers merge your v3 patch as-is), then sending a separate 2-part series (1/2: ArmVirtPkg, 2/2: OvmfPkg) would be straightforward, in my opinion. Thank you for considering my request (and for implementing the feature in the first place, of course)! Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#62684): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/62684 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/75483573/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
