On 05/10/20 23:29, Michael D Kinney wrote: > Rebecca, > > There is no difference between CI checks run during code review > and the final CI checks before merge. I think it is an interesting > conversation to decide how many times those CI checks should be > run and if they should run automatically on every change during > review or on demand. > > Mergify is more flexible. We want to make sure the git history > is linear with not git merges and supports both single patches > and patch series without squashing. GitHub merge button by > default squashes all commits into a single commit.
( Wow, "squash-on-merge" is even the *default* now? That's terrible. Unfortunately, github.com sets a very bad example with this, which is made worse by github's popularity. How can we expect developers to think about bisectability and patch series structuring as first class traits of their contributions if github.com actively educates them to ignore those aspects? Shaking my head. ) Laszlo -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#59177): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/59177 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/74089163/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
