> On Apr 23, 2020, at 3:42 AM, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote: > > BUt, I *think* the language seen in "OvmfPkg/License.txt" should > accommodate that too. It goes: > > Some files are subject to the following license, the [...] license. > Those files are located in: > - [directory] > - [directory] > > It says "some files", and where they are. It doesn't seem to imply that > *all* files under those directories are covered by the non-default license. > > So please just list all those module directories in this (non-default) > part of "BhyvePkg/License.txt" that have *at least one* file covered by > "BSD-2-Clause".
Would it also be ok to use the following language? Some files are subject to the following license, the BSD-2-Clause license. Those files are located in: AcpiPlatformDxe/Bhyve.c PlatformPei/MemDetect.c PlatformPei/Platform.c I think I’ve fixed the rest of the changes you’ve requested. I’m ready to send the v4 series once I get clarification about whether I should add my own copyright line to files I’ve copied from OvmfPkg and made no changes to, or only deletions or other very minor changes. — Rebecca Cran -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#58017): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/58017 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/73165367/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
