Sorry let me clarify a little more. I don't doubt that you spending the time to validate a patch using OVMF catches issues and regressions. I am very appreciative of that effort, my point is you could do that without being in the edk2 tree and in fact we need to enable and request that more do that for their given platforms (Platform CI needs to make this possible). I also didn't mean to imply that you only wanted your platform in the tree. My ask is that we evaluate a strategy where all platforms and all things not "core" get removed from edk2 proper. This means silicon specific modules move into silicon specific repos and packages full of limited use modules get moved out too. At that point we can focus edk2 on delivering a small, high quality core and focus the community on workflows that leverage multiple repos. There are numerous ways to keep multiple repos in sync that allow a user to root cause regressions. Using submodules is one way to easily track the version of edk2 that was/is used in the platform repo and when issues are identified the commit history can be bisected to find the problem. One other great benefit of multiple repos is that the repo maintainers can define their own workflows and requirements.
I am not as proficient as you at mailing list management. Nor are the people I interact with given that we all often miss many things we would like to comment on or change until post commit/integration. I equate much of this to the mailing list review process and the value to noise ratio of the mailing list. So although one package may not overwhelm, it does continue to distract from the most critical of changes in the core. Thanks Sean -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Groups.io Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#55705): https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/message/55705 Mute This Topic: https://groups.io/mt/71776477/21656 Group Owner: devel+ow...@edk2.groups.io Unsubscribe: https://edk2.groups.io/g/devel/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
